Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Insurance Claims
Oregon Court of Appeals Upholds Protections for Insurance Policyholders
In a landmark 2022 decision, the Oregon Court of Appeals bolstered policyholder protections in Moody v. Oregon Community Credit Union, affirming that insurance companies must act in good faith and comply with statutory standards. This ruling makes clear that insurers can be held accountable for emotional distress damages when they fail to properly investigate or settle claims, marking a significant advancement in personal injury law and consumer rights in Oregon.
Read More
Dog Bite Injuries: Uncovering the Hidden Financial Costs
This article discusses the financial costs of dog bite injuries. It examines the medical bills, legal fees, and other costs associated with such injuries and suggests ways to reduce these expenses.
Read More
Navigating Insurance Claims After a Personal Injury in Oregon: What You Need to Know
Understanding the tactics of insurance companies is crucial for personal injury victims in Oregon. Learn how to protect your rights and get the compensation you deserve.
Read More
Overcoming Insurance Hurdles after an Oregon Car Accident: An In-depth Guide
In the complex world of insurance claims following a car accident, understanding your rights is key. Pacific Injury Law Firm, based in Portland, Oregon, offers expert guidance on tackling insurer delays and refusals to settle. This blog post discusses how to navigate these challenges, the importance of legal representation and the options for negotiation and mediation. Learn how hiring an experienced personal injury attorney can ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.
Read More
What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon
The 1992 Oregon Supreme Court decision in Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. revolutionized the way liability insurers are held accountable, significantly bolstering protections for personal injury clients in Oregon. This landmark ruling affirmed that insurers must act with a fiduciary duty of care toward policyholders, providing a clearer path for pursuing tort claims against inadequate or negligent defense efforts by insurers. For individuals navigating personal injury claims, this case underscores the importance of understanding your rights and the heightened responsibilities of your insurer, ensuring stronger legal standing to seek redress for mishandled defenses or unmet settlement obligations.
Read MoreRecent Posts
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Oregon Personal Injury Cases: Understanding Claim Preclusion
administrative rulings
collateral estoppel
final judgment
issue preclusion
What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon
breach of contract
fiduciary duty
insurance claims
legal advice
Understanding the Impact of *White v. Jubitz Corp.* on Oregon Personal Injury Claims
collateral source rule
economic damages
full compensation recovery
jury awards
