• Call Now: (971) 277-3811
Top Oregon Injury Attorneys Top Oregon Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Firm History
    • Attorneys
      • Adam J. Brittle
      • Joining Soon!
    • Staff
      • Joining Soon!
  • Services
  • News
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • FAQs
    • LawPay Portal
    • Non-Injury Legal Referrals
    • Legal
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Legal Reasoning Of The Court

  • Home
  • Oregon Injury Blog Tag: Legal Reasoning Of The Court
  • Page 1 of 1
The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap | Best-Rated Oregon injury Lawyers

  The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap

In the landmark case of Scott Raymond Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc., the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury cases was unconstitutional. This decision significantly affects individuals seeking fair compensation for pain, suffering, and life-altering injuries.

Read More
Tags:
concurring and dissenting opinions   facts of the case   issue to be decided   landmark oregon supreme court decision   legal reasoning of the court   noneconomic damages cap   outcome of the court's decision   public policy implications  

Categories

Civil Justice System Legal Precedent Oregon Law Personal Injury Court of Appeals Jury Role Supreme Court Decisions Noneconomic Damages Constitutional Rights Public Policy Implications

Recent Posts

  Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Oregon Personal Injury Cases: Understanding Claim Preclusion administrative rulings collateral estoppel final judgment issue preclusion
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Oregon Personal Injury Cases: Understanding Claim Preclusion
  Understanding the Impact of *White v. Jubitz Corp.* on Oregon Personal Injury Claims collateral source rule economic damages full compensation recovery jury awards
Understanding the Impact of *White v. Jubitz Corp.* on Oregon Personal Injury Claims
  What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon breach of contract fiduciary duty insurance claims legal advice
What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon

Follow Pacific Injury Law Firm On Social Media

Quick Links
Home Contact Us Sitemap Firm History Blog
Online Payment
Trust Payment Pay Existing Bill

Proudly Serving
All Oregon Counties

  Klamath     Benton     Wheeler  
  Wallowa     Umatilla     Lake  
  Hood River     Lane     Morrow  
  Jefferson     Baker     Multnomah  
  Jackson     Deschutes     Crook  
  Columbia     Yamhill     Grant  
  Coos     Washington     Douglas  
  Curry     Sherman     Marion  
  Gilliam     Harney     Polk  
  Union     Malheur     Lincoln  
  Clatsop     Linn     Clackamas  
  Wasco     Josephine     Tillamook  
© 2025 Pacific Law Firms, LLC DBA Pacific Injury Law Firm | Oregon Injury Lawyers
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Content by Pacific Law Firms, LLC, all rights reserved.