Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Concurring And Dissenting Opinions

The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap | Best Oregon injury Attorneys

  The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap

In the landmark case of Scott Raymond Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc., the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury cases was unconstitutional. This decision significantly affects individuals seeking fair compensation for pain, suffering, and life-altering injuries.

Read More
Tags:
concurring and dissenting opinions   facts of the case   issue to be decided   landmark oregon supreme court decision   legal reasoning of the court   noneconomic damages cap   outcome of the court's decision   public policy implications  

Categories

Civil Justice System Legal Precedent Oregon Law Personal Injury Court of Appeals Jury Role Supreme Court Decisions Noneconomic Damages Constitutional Rights Public Policy Implications

Recent Posts

  Navigating DUII Cases in Oregon: a Victim's Legal Guide civil claims comparative fault economic damages evidence collection
  Understanding Oregon Commercial Truck Accident Claims attorney fees comparative fault evidence preservation insurance disputes
Understanding Oregon Commercial Truck Accident Claims
  Must-Know Oregon Motorcycle Accident Laws for Riders attorney fees comparative fault helmet compliance insurance disputes
Must-Know Oregon Motorcycle Accident Laws for Riders