Oregon Injury Law Blog
Category: Court Of Appeals
The Legal Consequences of Negligent Maintenance in Public Stores
Public stores have a legal responsibility to maintain their premises in a safe manner. Neglecting this responsibility can lead to serious consequences, such as being held liable for injuries or damages caused by hazardous conditions. Understanding the legal liabilities of public stores is essential.
Read More
The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap
In the landmark case of Scott Raymond Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc., the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury cases was unconstitutional. This decision significantly affects individuals seeking fair compensation for pain, suffering, and life-altering injuries.
Read More
Oregon Court of Appeals Upholds Protections for Insurance Policyholders
In a landmark 2022 decision, the Oregon Court of Appeals bolstered policyholder protections in *Moody v. Oregon Community Credit Union*, affirming that insurance companies must act in good faith and comply with statutory standards. This ruling makes clear that insurers can be held accountable for emotional distress damages when they fail to properly investigate or settle claims, marking a significant advancement in personal injury law and consumer rights in Oregon.
Read More
Understanding Oregon's Dram Shop Liability: A Rundown for Social Hosts
The blog post discusses an important Oregon court case that addressed the issue of social host liquor liability under the state's Dram Shop statute, ORS 471.565. The case involved a party host who was sued by a guest who was killed when two guests engaged in horseplay with loaded handguns, resulting in one guest being killed.
Read More
Deciphering the Three Levels of Proof Standards in Oregon Legal Cases
This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.
Read More
The Intricacies of Permanent Injury: A Legal Dissection of Elan v. Tate
Pacific Injury Law Firm explores the complexities surrounding the concept of permanent injury in personal injury law as unpacked by the Oregon Court of Appeals in Elan v. Tate. This case is a cautionary tale for legal practitioners and individuals involved in personal injury disputes and why substantial evidence is necessary to establish a claim of permanent injury.
Read More