Skip to main content

Blog category

Court Of Appeals

Oregon injury articles and practical claim guidance related to Court Of Appeals.

Court Of Appeals articles

  • Oregon Court of Appeals Upholds Protections for Insurance Policyholders

    Oregon Court of Appeals Upholds Protections for Insurance Policyholders

    Learn more
  • The Shifting Legal Scene on Oregon’s Noneconomic Damages Cap

    In the landmark case of Scott Raymond Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc., the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury cases was unconstitutional. This decision significantly affects individuals seeking fair compensation for pain, suffering, and life-altering injuries.

    Learn more
  • The Intricacies of Permanent Injury: A Legal Dissection of Elan v. Tate

    Pacific Injury Law Firm explores the complexities surrounding the concept of permanent injury in personal injury law as unpacked by the Oregon Court of Appeals in Elan v. Tate. This case is a cautionary tale for legal practitioners and individuals involved in personal injury disputes and why substantial evidence is necessary to establish a claim of permanent injury.

    Learn more
  • Oregon Dram Shop Liability: What Social Hosts Must Know to Avoid Legal Risks

    The blog post discusses an important Oregon court case that addressed the issue of social host liquor liability under the state's Dram Shop statute, ORS 471.565. The case involved a party host who was sued by a guest who was killed when two guests engaged in horseplay with loaded handguns, resulting in one guest being killed.

    Learn more
  • Deciphering the Three Levels of Proof Standards in Oregon Legal Cases

    This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.

    Learn more
  • The Legal Consequences of Negligent Maintenance in Public Stores

    Public stores have a legal responsibility to maintain their premises in a safe manner. Neglecting this responsibility can lead to serious consequences, such as being held liable for injuries or damages caused by hazardous conditions. Understanding the legal liabilities of public stores is essential.

    Learn more

Injured in Oregon?

Call or send the basics