Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)

How is liability determined in an Oregon motor vehicle accident case?
Liability in an Oregon motor vehicle accident case is determined based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. Generally, the claimant must prove that the other party owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and directly caused the accident and resulting injuries through negligence or wrongful actions. In Oregon, like in most states across America, all drivers must exercise a reasonable standard of care to avoid causing harm to others on the road. This includes obeying traffic laws, maintaining control over their vehicle, and being vigilant of potential hazards. The first step in determining liability is establishing whether a driver breached this duty of care by acting negligently or recklessly. Oregon follows a comparative negligence rule when determining fault in car accidents. Each party's degree of responsibility for causing an accident is assessed against another's conduct. If both parties are found partially at fault for an accident, their respective damages will be reduced according to their percentage of fault. For example, if Driver A were 75% responsible for causing an accident while Driver B was 25% at fault, Driver A would only recover 25% of his total damages from Driver B. In comparison, Driver B could recover 75% from Driver A. In Oregon, this rule is modified so that if a party is more than 50% or more at fault, they cannot recover. In this case, Driver A would recover nothing because they were the majority at fault, while Driver B would still recover 75% of their damages. Determining liability in Oregon car accident cases effectively requires gathering relevant evidence demonstrating how each party contributed (or did not contribute) to causing the collision. This may include obtaining police reports; speaking with witnesses; reviewing photographs or video footage capturing the scene; analyzing physical evidence such as skid marks or vehicle damage patterns; consulting with experts who can reconstruct how events unfolded based on available data; and exploring any potential violations of state traffic laws by involved parties. In addition to proving negligence on the part of another driver involved in an Oregon car accident case, claimants must also demonstrate causation – meaning they have suffered actual losses due to someone else's careless behavior. These losses could be economic, like medical bills and lost wages, or non-economic, like pain and suffering. Overall, determining liability in an Oregon car accident case is a complex process that requires thorough investigation and analysis of the specific facts surrounding each incident. Ultimately, the outcome will depend on how well a claimant can prove another party's negligence and their role in contributing to the accident.
How is liability determined in an Oregon pedestrian injury case?
In Oregon, liability determination in pedestrian injury cases relies on a careful examination of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. According to Pacific Injury Law Firm, an Oregon personal injury law firm, the claimant must establish three key elements to successfully prove that the driver is at fault for their accident and resulting injuries. These elements include: (1) duty of care; (2) breach of duty; and (3) causation. Firstly, it must be proven that the driver owed a duty of care to the pedestrian. In Oregon, all drivers are required by law to exercise reasonable care when operating their vehicles on public roads. This includes being attentive to pedestrians and obeying traffic signals and signs. Pedestrians also have a responsibility to follow traffic laws and exercise reasonable care for their own safety. Secondly, it must be established that the driver breached this duty of care by failing to act as a reasonably prudent person would under similar circumstances. Examples of such breaches may include speeding, running red lights or stop signs, texting while driving or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Lastly, it is necessary to demonstrate that this breach directly caused the accident and resulting injuries sustained by the pedestrian. This means proving that if not for the driver's negligence or wrongful actions, no harm would have come upon them. In some cases, both parties might share responsibility for an accident – known as comparative negligence in legal terms – which can affect compensation awarded to injured pedestrians proportionately based on each party's degree of fault. Under Oregon's modified comparative fault rule (ORS 31-600), if an injured pedestrian is found less than 50% at fault for their own injuries they may still recover damages reduced by their percentage of fault; however if they are found equally or more responsible than other involved parties they will not receive any compensation. Determining liability in an Oregon pedestrian injury case can require thorough investigation into evidence such as police reports, witness statements, surveillance footage, and expert testimony. Enlisting the help of an experienced personal injury attorney can be essential in navigating this complex process to ensure a fair outcome for injured pedestrians.
How is liability determined in an Oregon commercial truck accident case?
In Oregon, determining liability in a commercial truck accident case is a nuanced process involving examining the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. To successfully prove liability, the claimant must establish three key elements: (1) duty of care; (2) breach of duty; and (3) causation. First, it must be shown that the defendant owed a legal responsibility or "duty of care" to drive safely and follow all applicable regulations. This standard applies not only to truck drivers but also to other parties involved in the operation of commercial vehicles, such as trucking companies, cargo loaders, and vehicle manufacturers. Given this broad scope, multiple parties may bear some liability in a single accident case. Second, the claimant must demonstrate that one or more defendants breached their duty by acting negligently or wrongfully. Evidence supporting this breach may include violations of traffic laws or industry regulations and failure to maintain equipment or conduct necessary background checks on drivers properly. Furthermore, a plaintiff may establish negligence through a legal concept known as "negligence *per se*," which holds that certain actions are inherently negligent if they violate specific laws intended to protect public safety. Lastly, there must be a direct causal link between the defendant's breach and the accident. In other words, the plaintiff must prove that if not for the defendant's negligence or wrongful actions, the accident would not have occurred and caused injury to others. Once these elements are established by presenting sufficient evidence – such as police reports, eyewitness testimony, and expert analysis – the court will evaluate each party's level of responsibility based on comparative fault principles under Oregon law. This means that damages awarded will be proportionate according to each party's percentage share in causing harm. Seeking legal advice from an experienced personal injury attorney is essential for successfully navigating these complex considerations when pursuing compensation for injuries sustained in an Oregon commercial truck accident case.
How do I know if I have a valid personal injury claim in Oregon?
Determining whether you have a valid personal injury claim in Oregon involves a careful examination of the facts surrounding your case, as well as an understanding of the legal principles that apply. Generally, to establish a successful claim, you must demonstrate that another party owed you a duty of care, breached that duty through negligence or wrongful actions and directly caused your injuries and damages as a result. In Oregon, the "duty of care" concept is central to many personal injury claims. This refers to an obligation imposed upon individuals or entities to act with reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others. For example, drivers owe other motorists and pedestrians a duty of care when operating their vehicles on public roads. Once it has been established that another party owed you a duty of care, you must prove they breached this duty by engaging in negligent or wrongful behavior. In the context of motor vehicle accidents, this can include speeding, driving under the influence, or texting while driving. Property owners may breach their duty by failing to maintain safe conditions in premises liability cases- such as slip-and-fall accidents. The next element necessary for proving your claim is causation – specifically linking the other party's breach of their duty with your injuries and damages. You must demonstrate that, but for their negligence or wrongful actions, you would not have suffered harm. It is important to note that Oregon follows a modified comparative negligence rule which allows for damages recovery even if you are partially at fault for your accident (as long as your share doesn't exceed 50%). Lastly, one has to quantify one's damages resulting from the incident, including medical expenses incurred due to injuries sustained during an accident, present and future wage loss, and pain and suffering from physical trauma. Given these complexities involved in establishing a valid personal injury claim in Oregon—consulting with an experienced personal injury attorney can be invaluable. A skilled attorney will guide you through each element of your case, assess the strength of your claim, and help you navigate the legal process to obtain fair compensation for your injuries and losses.
How is liability determined in an Oregon wrongful death case?
In an Oregon wrongful death case, determining liability involves a thorough examination of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. The claimant must establish certain elements to prove that the defendant is responsible for the death due to their negligence or wrongful actions. These elements include duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Firstly, it must be established that the defendant owed a duty of care to the deceased person. Duty of care refers to a legal obligation on individuals or entities to exercise reasonable caution while performing actions that could potentially harm others. In wrongful death cases, this often applies to situations such as medical professionals providing treatment or drivers operating vehicles. Once it has been established that a duty of care existed between the defendant and deceased person, the claimant must then demonstrate that this duty was breached. This may involve showing evidence that the defendant failed to adhere to established standards or acted in a manner contrary to what a reasonably prudent person would have done under similar circumstances. The next element required in determining liability is causation. To successfully argue causation in an Oregon wrongful death case, it is necessary for claimants not only to show that there was a connection between defendants' breach of duty and deceased's death but also that defendants' negligence was a substantial factor in causing their demise. Lastly, damages must be proven by demonstrating how much financial loss has been suffered by surviving family members due to their loved one's untimely passing. This can include compensation for funeral expenses, loss of income from decedent's work contributions, and emotional suffering experienced by family members who are left behind. In conclusion, liability in an Oregon wrongful death case depends on whether these vital elements have been sufficiently demonstrated: proving existence and breach of duty owed; establishing causation; and quantifying financial losses resulting from decedent's passing. By meticulously examining each aspect related to these factors within specific cases at hand—along with guidance from experienced legal counsel—surviving family members can better navigate the complex realms of wrongful death litigation and potentially secure rightful compensation for their immeasurable losses.
What is Oregon's comparative negligence law, and how does it affect my personal injury case?
Oregon's comparative negligence law, also known as the modified comparative fault system, is a critical aspect of personal injury cases in the state. This legal principle attempts to allocate fairly responsibility and compensation among all parties involved in an accident based on their respective degrees of fault. The modified comparative negligence system operates under the understanding that more than one party may share some blame in many accidents. In Oregon, this means that if you are found to be partially at fault for your injuries in a personal injury case, your recovery (i.e., compensation) may be reduced by your percentage of responsibility up to a limit of 50%. If your degree of fault is determined to be greater than 50%, you will not be able to recover any damages. For example, let's say you were involved in a car accident with another driver who ran a red light, but you were also speeding. The court might find that the other driver was 70% responsible for causing the accident while you were 30% responsible due to excessive speed. In this situation, if your total damages amounted to $100,000, under Oregon's comparative negligence law, you would receive $70,000 – or 70% – since your degree of fault was 30%. This approach allows courts and juries to more equitably distribute liability and awards based on each party's actions contributing to an incident. It encourages claimants and defendants alike to carefully evaluate their behavior when seeking legal remedies for personal injury accidents. In practical terms, for those pursuing personal injury cases in Oregon, you must work closely with experienced attorneys who have deep knowledge about how comparative negligence laws apply within different types of claims scenarios. They can help gather evidence supporting arguments regarding other parties' levels of responsibility while minimizing any potential reductions directly or indirectly related to actions taken by claimants. Ultimately Oregon's comparative negligence law seeks justice through nuance, recognizing that accidents are often complex events with many contributing factors. By understanding and effectively navigating these principles, those seeking compensation for their injuries can work toward the fairest possible outcome in light of all pertinent circumstances.
How is liability determined in an Oregon motorcycle accident case?
In Oregon, determining liability in a motorcycle accident case hinges on the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. Claimants must establish three key elements to prove liability: duty of care, breach of duty, and causation. Firstly, the claimant must demonstrate that the other party owed them a duty of care. This is generally straightforward in motorcycle accident cases because all drivers are legally obligated to exercise reasonable care while operating their vehicles on public roads. This includes obeying traffic laws and being mindful of other motorists' safety. Once it has been established that a duty of care existed between both parties involved in the accident, the claimant must prove that this duty was breached by the defendant's negligent or wrongful actions. Examples of such actions could include speeding, running red lights or stop signs, failure to yield right-of-way, driving under the influence (DUI), texting, or engaging with distractions while driving. Lastly, claimants must demonstrate causation, i.e., show that their injuries resulted directly from the defendant's breach of their duty. This requires proving a clear connection between any alleged negligence or wrongful conduct by other motorists and specific injuries sustained during an accident. Victims must gather substantial evidence illustrating this causal link which can be accomplished through eyewitness testimony (if available), police reports describing what transpired at crash scenes as well medical records detailing the nature and extent suffered due to collisions. Oregon adheres to a comparative negligence system when determining damages awards for personal injury claims. Under this framework, each party's degree of fault is assessed based on their respective contributions towards causing an accident; if found partially responsible themselves (e.g., not wearing a helmet or making risky maneuvers), plaintiffs may see potential compensation reduced proportionately according to amount blame assigned them by court jurors evaluating cases merits during trial proceedings. Therefore, it is crucial for those involved in accidents to consult with experienced legal counsel to navigate the complexities of establishing liability and obtaining fair compensation.
How is liability determined in an Oregon bicycle accident case?
In Oregon, as in many other states, determining liability in a bicycle accident case requires thoroughly examining the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. According to Pacific Injury Law Firm, an Oregon personal injury law firm, the claimant must generally prove three essential elements: that the other party owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and directly caused the accident and resulting injuries through their negligence or wrongful actions. The first step in establishing liability is determining whether a duty of care exists between the parties involved. In most cases involving motor vehicles and bicycles sharing public roads, this duty arises because drivers are obligated to exercise reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others on the roadways. This obligation extends to other drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians. Once it has been demonstrated that a duty of care existed between the parties, it must be shown that this duty was breached by one or more individuals involved in the incident. This breach can occur when someone's actions deviate from what would be expected of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances. For example, if drivers fail to yield at an intersection or use their cell phones while driving, they may be considered negligent for not exercising reasonable care. Next comes proving causation – specifically, that any breach of duty directly resulted in the accident and subsequent injuries sustained by those involved. This often involves providing evidence such as witness testimony or video footage showing how one party's negligence led directly to an otherwise preventable collision. Finally, Oregon follows a modified comparative fault rule when allocating damages between parties found liable for causing an accident. This means that if both parties share responsibility for causing an accident (e.g., if both were speeding), their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault up to 50%. Should one party be found more than 50% responsible for causing an accident, they will no longer qualify for receiving any compensation from others deemed partially at fault. In conclusion, determining liability in an Oregon bicycle accident case is a complex process that requires closely examining the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. By establishing a duty of care, breach, causation, and comparative fault when appropriate, parties involved can work towards resolving their claims effectively and fairly.
How does Oregon law determine liability in a slip and fall case?
In Oregon, as in most states, liability in slip and fall cases is determined by the legal theory of negligence. In order to establish liability on the part of a property owner or occupier, the injured party must prove that the defendant was negligent in their duty to maintain a reasonably safe environment for visitors. This involves demonstrating several key elements: that the defendant knew or should have known about the dangerous condition, had a reasonable opportunity to address it, and failed to take appropriate action to prevent the accident. In assessing whether a property owner or occupier should have been aware of a hazardous condition, courts will typically examine whether it was foreseeable. This means considering factors such as how long the hazard existed and whether there were any warning signs or other indicators that should have alerted them to its presence. If it can be shown that an attentive property owner would have noticed and addressed the issue had they been exercising reasonable care, then they may be held liable for failing to do so. Once knowledge of the dangerous condition has been established, it is also necessary for plaintiffs to prove that defendants had a reasonable opportunity to correct it before an injury occurred. This often hinges on questions of timing – for example, if a spill occurred just moments before someone slipped on it and there was no way for staff members at an establishment like a grocery store could respond quickly enough before someone gets hurt; then under those circumstances likely they will not be held responsible because they did not have time at their disposal in addressing potential hazards. Finally, plaintiffs must demonstrate that defendants failed to take appropriate action once made aware of hazardous conditions present within their premises - this includes steps such as cleaning up spills promptly upon discovery or placing clear warning signs around areas where risks are heightened due ongoing construction work etcetera so visitors can avoid putting themselves into harm's way unknowingly while still being able access essential services provided by businesses operating adjacent locations affected by said works projects underway nearby during timeframe when accidents occur all too often resulting from inadequate safety precautions being taken overall throughout process involved therein. In sum, Oregon law requires plaintiffs in slip and fall cases to prove that defendants were negligent in failing to maintain safe premises. This entails demonstrating knowledge of a dangerous condition, a reasonable opportunity to address it, and a failure to take appropriate action. Ultimately, the outcome of such cases will depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved, as well as the skill of the attorneys representing both parties.
Can multiple parties be held liable for a wrongful death in Oregon?
In Oregon, multiple parties can be held liable for a wrongful death. This is particularly relevant in cases where negligence or wrongful actions by several parties contribute to the death of an individual. In such situations, Oregon law allows each party involved to be assigned a percentage of liability based on their level of fault. The financial compensation awarded to the victim's family or estate may then be divided among the responsible parties accordingly. According to Pacific Injury Law Firm, an Oregon personal injury law firm focusing on wrongful death cases, this proportional allocation of liability is essential to the state's legal system when handling complex cases involving multiple at-fault entities. The victim's family can seek justice and recover damages from each accountable individual or entity by apportioning responsibility among all contributing parties. To determine and allocate fault among multiple defendants in a wrongful death case in Oregon, courts will typically consider factors such as each party's degree of involvement in the incident and their respective knowledge or awareness of potential harm that could result from their actions. For example, if a fatal accident were caused by both a negligent driver and faulty traffic signals installed by a municipality, a jury could potentially find both entities liable for contributing to the wrongful death. Furthermore, Oregon follows what is known as "joint and several liability." This legal principle means that if one party cannot pay its share of damages awarded in a lawsuit—perhaps due to bankruptcy—a plaintiff can collect that unpaid portion from other defendants found liable for causing harm. In essence, joint and several liability ensures that victims are not left uncompensated simply because one defendant cannot fulfill its financial obligations. In conclusion, Oregon law recognizes that multiple parties can bear responsibility for causing wrongful deaths—and allows those affected by these tragic events to pursue claims against all responsible actors. By assigning proportional liability based on each entity's level of fault and employing joint and several liability principles when applicable, courts aim at ensuring that justice is served and victims' families are compensated for their loss fairly and equitably.
What is a personal injury case in Oregon?
A personal injury case in Oregon is a legal matter in which an individual seeks compensation for physical, emotional, and financial damages they have sustained due to another party's negligent or wrongful actions. As explained by Pacific Injury Law Firm—an Oregon-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases—common types of personal injury cases include car accidents, motorcycle accidents, slip and fall incidents, medical malpractice suits, and defective product claims. In Oregon, individuals who believe they have a viable personal injury claim must adhere to specific statutes of limitations. For most personal injury cases—including car accidents or slip and fall incidents—the statute of limitations is two years from the injury's date. Medical malpractice claims require filing within two years from when the injured party discovers—or reasonably should have discovered—the harm caused by the medical professional's negligence (with some exceptions). However, under no circumstances can a medical malpractice claim be filed more than five years after the date on which the negligent act occurred. Personal injury lawsuits in Oregon operate under a comparative negligence system. This means that if both parties involved share responsibility for causing an accident or incident leading to injuries, each party's percentage of fault will determine their potential compensation. The injured individual's recovery amount will be reduced proportionally based on their degree of culpability; however, as long as they are less than 50% at fault for their injuries, they may still recover damages. Damages awarded in Oregon personal injury cases generally fall into three categories: economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages), non-economic damages (pain and suffering), and punitive damages (meant to punish particularly egregious behavior). It is worth noting that Oregon has placed caps on non-economic damages ($500K) and punitive damages at $500K or three times compensatory damages (whichever is greater). Navigating a personal injury case in Oregon can be complex; it requires understanding specific laws governing liability and compensation and adhering to strict filing deadlines. If you believe you have a valid personal injury claim, it is advisable to consult with an experienced attorney who can help guide you through the process and fight for the fair compensation you deserve.
How can I strengthen my Oregon personal injury claim?
To support your Oregon personal injury claim, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. A primary strategy includes: Accumulating evidence. Promptly seeking medical treatment and adhering to the recommendations of healthcare professionals. Meticulously documenting expenses related to the accident. Maintaining a detailed account of your injuries and recovery progress. Engaging the expertise of an experienced personal injury attorney. Gathering evidence is crucial for substantiating your claim. This entails procuring photographs or videos depicting the accident scene from various angles and any visible injuries sustained. Additionally, obtaining statements from witnesses who can attest to what transpired during the incident is essential. These individuals may be called upon later in court proceedings or deposition hearings to corroborate your version of events. Seeking medical attention as soon as possible following an accident promotes physical recovery and serves as vital documentation for building a solid case. Ensure that healthcare providers record all diagnoses and treatment recommendations - this information will be instrumental in demonstrating the extent of your injuries and their impact on your daily life. Maintaining organized records of all expenses incurred due to the accident is imperative for establishing damages in a personal injury case. This includes medical bills, prescriptions, transportation costs for appointments or therapy sessions, lost wages due to missed workdays, or reduced earning capacity resulting from ongoing symptoms or complications. In addition to tracking financial losses associated with your injuries, keeping a diary detailing how they have affected you emotionally and physically can provide compelling evidence when negotiating with insurance companies or presenting arguments before a jury at trial. Be sure to chronicle any physical pain experienced daily along with descriptions of activities you were once able to perform but now find challenging due to lingering effects from the incident. Last - but certainly not least - enlisting the services of an esteemed personal injury attorney is key in navigating complex legal terrain while advocating on your behalf throughout settlement negotiations or litigation proceedings if necessary. At Pacific Injury Law Firm in Oregon, our seasoned lawyers are committed to protecting your rights and pursuing the compensation you deserve after a life-altering accident.

Oregon Personal Injury Law Blog

We work hard to stay up to date on the law and developments in Oregon injury law that may help our clients. Our firm maintains a policy of "information first" for the client, so we make every effort to share information with the public and clients. Our blog covers topics from the frequently asked questions (FAQs) that Oregon injury Lawyers encounter to news headlines that impact attorneys who help injured people. If there is a topic you would like to see covered, let us know, and we'll add it to our list of subject matter!

Navigating Fault Determination in Oregon Car Accident Injury Cases | Top Oregon Injury Lawyers

Navigating Fault Determination In Oregon Car Accident Injury Cases

Car accidents can lead to severe injuries and financial losses. This blog post delves into the process of proving fault in a car accident injury case, from gathering evidence like police reports and witness statements to determining negligence and consulting with an experienced attorney. Understanding these steps is crucial for building a strong case and ensuring fair compensation for damages sustained in the accident.

Read More
Understanding Negligence: A Deep Dive into Oregon's Personal Injury Law | Best Oregon Injury Lawyers

Understanding Negligence: A Deep Dive Into Oregon's Personal Injury Law

The article explores the history and legal concept of negligence, which is a fundamental part of personal injury law. It traces the origins of negligence law back to England and its development in the United States, including its four basic elements of duty, breach, causation, and damages. The article also explains how negligence is defined under Oregon law and discusses the state's recognition of comparative negligence and negligence per se.

Read More
Deciphering Wrongful Death Cases in Oregon: The Role of Negligence | Top-Rated Oregon Injury Attorneys

Deciphering Wrongful Death Cases In Oregon: The Role Of Negligence

This post discusses the components of a successful wrongful death case in Oregon, including the need to prove negligence, potential damages, the statute of limitations, and the use of expert witnesses. It emphasizes the importance of working with experienced legal professionals to achieve a favorable outcome.

Read More
Establishing Fault in Oregon Pedestrian Accident Injury Cases | Best-Rated Oregon Injury Lawyers

Establishing Fault In Oregon Pedestrian Accident Injury Cases

To prove fault in a pedestrian accident injury case, it is critical to gather evidence such as witness statements, video footage, and police reports. Seeking medical attention right away and documenting injuries can also strengthen the case.

Read More
An Insightful Guide on Wrongful Death Claims in Oregon | Best-Rated Oregon Injury Lawyers

An Insightful Guide On Wrongful Death Claims In Oregon

A guide to comprehending the aspects of a wrongful death lawsuit, including the legal definition, types of damages and evidence required to prove negligence or wrongdoing.

Read More
Establishing Negligence in Premises Liability Claims: A Guide | Top-Rated Oregon Injury Attorneys

Establishing Negligence In Premises Liability Claims: A Guide

Discover how to prove negligence in a premises liability case with this informative blog post. Learn the importance of gathering evidence such as photographs, witness testimonies, incident reports, and expert opinions to strengthen your case. Consult with experienced attorneys at Pacific Injury Law Firm for guidance and representation in seeking compensation for injuries sustained on someone else's property.

Read More
The Intricacies of Permanent Injury: A Legal Dissection of Elan v. Tate | Best-Rated Oregon Injury Attorneys

The Intricacies Of Permanent Injury: A Legal Dissection Of Elan V. Tate

Pacific Injury Law Firm explores the complexities surrounding the concept of permanent injury in personal injury law as unpacked by the Oregon Court of Appeals in Elan v. Tate. This case is a cautionary tale for legal practitioners and individuals involved in personal injury disputes and why substantial evidence is necessary to establish a claim of permanent injury.

Read More

Practice Areas

Learn more about the types of injuries our Attorneys help with.

Car Accident Injury

Car accidents turn lives upside down, leaving a trail of injuries and medical bills. In the chaotic aftermath, let us guide you through the legal maze and secure the compensation you deserve.

Commercial Truck Accident Injury

Big trucks often mean significant accidents. When one of these beasts of the road goes off script, it can cause huge damage. Let us navigate the complexities of commercial insurance.

Wrongful Death

Wrongful death cases are some of the hardest matters to handle for clients because money cannot replace a loved one. However, after death from negligence, financial recovery can help the family move f

Personal Injury

Discover expert personal injury legal support with Pacific Injury Law Firm in Oregon. Specializing in securing compensation for the injured, we navigate the complexities of the law, so you focus on re

Pedestrian Accident Injury

Sometimes you don't even have to be driving to be in a car accident. Did you know that car insurance can and does cover pedestrian accidents? We do. Let us help.

Motorcycle Accident Injury

Discover expert representation for motorcycle accident injuries in Oregon with Pacific Injury Law Firm. Our dedicated attorneys specialize in overcoming biases and securing maximum compensation for mo

Premises Liability

Stores and places open to the public have a duty to keep you safe. If negligence causes slips, trips, burns, breaks, or falls, we can help.

Bicycle Accident Injury

In Oregon's cycling community, accidents impact deeply. Our lawyers focus on swift insurance claims for injured cyclists. You focus on recovery; we'll get you back in the saddle financially.

Oregon Drunk Driver Accident Injury

Drunk driving accidents shatter lives. We're here to hold offenders accountable and fight for your recovery every step of the way.

Schedule A Free Consultation

We will always talk to you about your case for free. Call today.

Call Now For A Free Consultation
Schedule Online Now
Call the Best Oregon injury Lawyers today.