Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Preponderance Of The Evidence
Uninsured Driving in Oregon: Navigating Personal Injury Case Recovery Restrictions
The article discusses the legal limitations on recovering damages in personal injury cases in Oregon if the plaintiff was driving uninsured at the time of the accident. The article cites ORS 31.715, which limits the recovery of noneconomic damages in a personal injury lawsuit if the plaintiff was in violation of ORS 806.010 (driving uninsured) at the time of the accident. The article explains the limitations on liability established by this law and provides exceptions to the limitation. The article notes that an experienced personal injury law firm can help plaintiffs navigate these legal limitations and maximize their recovery in a personal injury lawsuit.
Read More
Deciphering the Three Levels of Proof Standards in Oregon Legal Cases
This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.
Read MoreRecent Posts
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Oregon Personal Injury Cases: Understanding Claim Preclusion
administrative rulings
collateral estoppel
final judgment
issue preclusion
Understanding the Impact of *White v. Jubitz Corp.* on Oregon Personal Injury Claims
collateral source rule
economic damages
full compensation recovery
jury awards
What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon
breach of contract
fiduciary duty
insurance claims
legal advice
