Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Preponderance Of The Evidence
Understanding the Standards of Proof in Oregon Law
This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.
Read More
Driving Uninsured in Oregon: Legal Limitations on Recovery in Personal Injury Cases
The article discusses the legal limitations on recovering damages in personal injury cases in Oregon if the plaintiff was driving uninsured at the time of the accident. The article cites ORS 31.715, which limits the recovery of noneconomic damages in a personal injury lawsuit if the plaintiff was in violation of ORS 806.010 (driving uninsured) at the time of the accident. The article explains the limitations on liability established by this law and provides exceptions to the limitation. The article notes that an experienced personal injury law firm can help plaintiffs navigate these legal limitations and maximize their recovery in a personal injury lawsuit.
Read MoreRecent Posts
Seeking Justice: Understanding Wrongful Death Cases in Oregon
children
compensation
economic damages
financial support loss
The 8 Most Frequently Asked Questions After an Oregon Car Accident
aftermath
appropriate medical care
car accidents
clients' well-being