Oregon Injury Law Blog
Tag: Civil Cases
Deciphering the Three Levels of Proof Standards in Oregon Legal Cases
This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.
Read More
Understanding Alternative Dispute Resolution: Arbitration vs Mediation
Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") is becoming an increasingly important option in many jurisdictions. ADR refers to efforts to find methods that are outside the court system to resolve civil disputes. These methods may be advantageous to the courts and to the parties involved since they may resolve a dispute in a faster, more cost-effective manner and reduce or eliminate the need for participation by the court system.
Read MoreRecent Posts
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Oregon Personal Injury Cases: Understanding Claim Preclusion
administrative rulings
collateral estoppel
final judgment
issue preclusion
Understanding the Impact of *White v. Jubitz Corp.* on Oregon Personal Injury Claims
collateral source rule
economic damages
full compensation recovery
jury awards
What Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. Means for Personal Injury Clients in Oregon
breach of contract
fiduciary duty
insurance claims
legal advice
