Oregon Injury Law Blog
Category: Legal Definitions
Deciphering the Three Levels of Proof Standards in Oregon Legal Cases
This text explains the different standards of proof in Oregon law. The lowest standard is "preponderance of the evidence" which is used in most civil cases. The middle standard is "clear and convincing evidence" which requires more evidence than the previous one and is often used in cases involving serious consequences. The highest standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which is used in criminal cases and requires the prosecution to prove its case to such a degree that there can be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person.
Read More
An Insightful Guide on Wrongful Death Claims in Oregon
A guide to comprehending the aspects of a wrongful death lawsuit, including the legal definition, types of damages and evidence required to prove negligence or wrongdoing.
Read More
Understanding Negligence: A Deep Dive into Oregon's Personal Injury Law
The article explores the history and legal concept of negligence, which is a fundamental part of personal injury law. It traces the origins of negligence law back to England and its development in the United States, including its four basic elements of duty, breach, causation, and damages. The article also explains how negligence is defined under Oregon law and discusses the state's recognition of comparative negligence and negligence per se.
Read More
Understanding Accident Liability: A Comprehensive Guide
Every contested auto accident involves two major issues - "liability" and "damages." Liability simply means that the other party must be legally liable before he or she has any obligation to pay compensation for injuries.
Read More